Matthew Hayden <mrehay...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> What's wrong with the System.Random.StdGen implementation of
> RandomGen?[1] (I'm not sure if it's cryptographically safe)

It's a poor PRNG.  And no, it's not anywhere near suitable for
cryptographic applications.


> Someone (Cale IIRC) has already implemented a Rand monad[2] which is
> like a state monad but it keeps a RandomGen instead.

  http://hackage.haskell.org/package/MonadRandom

  by "Cale Gibbard and others"


Greets,
Ertugrul


-- 
nightmare = unsafePerformIO (getWrongWife >>= sex)
http://blog.ertes.de/


_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to