Ivan Miljenovic wrote: > 5) No-one is convincing anyone else to their point of view, so we > have a stale mate.
Would allowing pseudonyms but requiring them to be explicitly marked as such be an acceptable compromise? Ganesh =============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html =============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
