Hi Henning and Nicolas Thanks, but... I'm not arguing that the functions are generally useful so inter-defined-ness is beside the point. I've a couple of instances, in code that is sadly too complicated and I hope to simplify later, where the describing/naming the traversal currently adds clarity and makes the code marginally more succinct. I recognize this is somewhat unusual - indeed the previous times I've used these two functionals I've refactored them out later - but at the moment they are a benefit, so its the names that I'm asking about not the definitions.
Best wishes Stephen _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
