On 08/04/2010 06:27, Dean Herington wrote:
Is there any reason not to use the more standard "uninterruptible" instead of "noninterruptible"?
Good point, I'll change that.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
