Ashley Yakeley <ash...@semantic.org> writes: > There's an impedance mismatch between the IEEE notion of equality > (under which -0.0 == 0.0), and the Haskell notion of equality (where > we'd want x == y to imply f x == f y).
Do we also want to modify equality for lazy bytestrings, where equality is currently independent of chunk segmentation? (I.e. toChunks s1 == toChunks s2 ==> s1 == s2 but not vice versa.) My preference would be to keep Eq as it is, a rough approximation of an intuitive notion of equality. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
