Hello Luke,
I mean something like
data FirstName = FirstName
data LastName = LastName
data BirthDate = BirthDate
ie.
data FirstName
data LastName
data BirthDate
In HaskellDB's case this is part of what's necessary to define
individual columns.
Another part is:
instance FieldTag FirstName where
fieldName = const "firstName"
HaskellDB is using type level stuff quite heavily and since you're a bit
of a wizkid on avoiding it where not necessary and keeping things
"functional" I'm hoping you might come up with something. :)
Best regards
Günther
Am 25.04.10 23:22, schrieb Luke Palmer:
2010/4/25 Günther Schmidt<gue.schm...@web.de>:
Hello,
HaskellDB makes extensive use of Singleton Types, both in its original
version and the more recent one where it's using HList instead of the legacy
implementation.
I wonder if it is possible, not considering feasibility for the moment, to
implement HaskellDB *without* using Singleton Types.
Would you please define "singleton type"?
Luke
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
