Christopher Lane Hinson schrieb: > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > >>> I despair that a better Numeric hierarchy will never make it into >>> Haskell. >> >> >> I thought the main reason for that was that nobody could agree on a >> "better" hierarchy that was actually usable. (Nobody wants to chain >> 10 typeclasses together to get work done.) > > I think that there is a way to do this so that everyone can be happy, if > hassled. > > But GHC already has what we need to define our own numeric preludes. > What we don't have is any numeric prelude at all.
NumericPrelude does not count as numeric prelude? :-( http://hackage.haskell.org/package/numeric-prelude/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
