On May 3, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Limestraël wrote:
> Thank you all, that's very interesting.
>
> Martin, I've started reading the paper, I like the way you think about what a
> scripting language should provide ("traceability, error handling and a type
> system").
> But, hold me if I'm wrong, but at no moment in the paper you made you own
> language? It's a EDSL, not a DSL,
That's correct. We have defined a DSEL, but in my view this is still a DSL; the
"E" only refers to a specific way of implementing it.
> so I don't see where is the scripting, since the program will always have to
> be recompiled, won't it?
I may have misunderstood your goals and what you mean by "scripting". Our DSEL
is intended to be used for expressing all kinds of scripting tasks.
--
Martin
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
