As the author of haskeem, I'm thrilled that you are considering it,
but to be honest I'm not quite sure it's embeddable in the way (I
think) you want. If you want to give it a try, though, I'd be more
than happy to try to help.

best, Uwe

On 5/5/10, Limestraël <limestr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> However, I don't forget that my goal is to get a system monitor
> configuration language.
>
> Lua may have some functional components, it remains imperative, I think a
> more declarative language like Scheme would be more appropriate (and there
> is also a scheme interpreter, haskeem).
> What do you think about it?
>
>
> 2010/5/5 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com>
>
>> Limestraël <limestr...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > How do you embed Lua in Haskell?
>>
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hslua
>>
>> --
>> Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
>> ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
>> IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to