On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Ivan Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Well, based on what you want your priorites to be, I might bow out > then (at least until you start wanting to have graph-centric > operations in there, then I might pitch in). > Well, we do now want it to be graph-centric, but graphs definitely play a role here! We may want to implement algorithms relying on graphs. > On 6 May 2010 04:23, Alp Mestanogullari <a...@mestan.fr> wrote: > Any particular reason for using patch-tag rather than > code.haskell.org? For the wiki? > Yeah I thought about your objection, but the two main reasons are the gitit wiki (way handier for maths stuffs than trac's) and the easy handling of new contributors and project management -- it is way more manual on c.h.o for example, whereas everything is automated on patch-tag. The user-tied aspect is a bit annoying but should be fine ; i will definitely do mathematics and haskell for a while heh. -- Alp Mestanogullari http://alpmestan.wordpress.com/ http://alp.developpez.com/
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
