On 17/05/2010, at 05:17, Gregory Crosswhite wrote: > As an aside, while there are advantages to writing numerical analysis > routines in Haskell, it might be better strategy to instead link in something > like LAPACK and provide nice wrappers to it in Haskell, since this way you > can harness the work of the experts who have spent a lot of time perfecting > their code rather than re-inventing the wheel.
I don't see think this is an either/or question. A good array library ought to provide BLAS, Lapack, FFTW etc. bindings *and* allow writing high-performance code in pure Haskell. I haven't implemented any of these bindings for vector only because I'm still deciding what to do with multidimensional arrays. Roman _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
