On 20/05/2010, at 9:53 AM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
> 
> The key point is the 'that would NATURALLY have', which I take
> to mean "as a result of type inference without any forcibly
> imposed type signatures".

In my second edition of Bird, the question just says: "Give examples of 
functions with the following types:"

Tom_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to