Well, this does not contradict Sam's point, which was that you may have written nicer, faster and more elegant code in way less time, had you used a true programming language ;-)
El 26/05/2010, a las 12:28, David Sankel escribió: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Sam Martin <sam.mar...@geomerics.com> wrote: > There’s a lot of missed opportunities for more elegant and powerful > architectures going by at the moment simple because it’s not realistic to > attempt them in C/C++. > > I beg to differ on that point. See my presentation[1]/paper[2] I gave at > boostcon a couple weeks ago. I have successfully used C++ as a functional > language in multiple production software applications, including FRP designs. > > [1] http://www.filetolink.com/c109d02b > [2] http://www.filetolink.com/ff94ea7e > > David > > -- > David Sankel > Sankel Software > www.sankelsoftware.com > 585 617 4748 (Office) > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
