On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Ivan Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 16 June 2010 15:45, Roman Cheplyaka <r...@ro-che.info> wrote: > > * aditya siram <aditya.si...@gmail.com> [2010-06-15 19:47:37-0400] > >> Hi all, > >> Haskell is a great language and in a lot of ways it still hasn't found a > >> niche, but that's part of what is great about it. > >> > >> But I wanted to ask people are more experienced with Haskell - what > kinds of > >> problems is it unsuited for? Have you ever regretted using it for > something? > >> Meaning if you could write the program over you would do it in another > >> language. > > > > This topic was already discussed on this list, you might want to search > > the archives. > > Spoilsport! :p > > Next you'll say there's no need for anyone to ask whether they prefer > vi or emacs... ;-) > > Of course *real* programmers use ed. It is the standard editor[1]. Michael [1] http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
