On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Stephen Tetley <stephen.tet...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Michael > > If you going to the trouble of constructing a sum type (obliged to be > 2 parameter) expressly to play well with the favourite single > parameter classes e.g. Functor/ Applicative / Monad [*], maybe it is > worth considering new names for the type and its constructors relating > to what the Applicative/Monad instances actually model. > > I'm definitely open to such an approach, but I couldn't come up with any good names ;). I'm open to suggestions. As an aside, my wife is a classics major (Greek and Latin), and she recommended I name the constructors "Sinister" and "Dexter". Michael
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
