And conversely, someone who have made a C-to-Haskell binding may not be a Haskell guru.
What about Arrows: do you think one should master them so that he could be regarded as experienced? It's kind of hard to put a border between casual Haskell and skilled Haskell, since it's a very wide language and your knowledge will depend on what you have already done. 2010/7/3 Thomas Davie <tom.da...@gmail.com> > > On 3 Jul 2010, at 11:04, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 7/3/10 05:57 , Andrew Coppin wrote: > >> Agreed. So let me rephrase: Why should _every_ Haskell library involve > C? ;-) > > > > Who says they do, or should? > > Dons rather implied it... The suggestion is that someone who hasn't used > hsc2hs is an inexperienced Haskeller... I'd bet though that there are many > *extremely* experienced haskellers who have never once in their life written > a C binding. > > Bob_______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
