On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:57:34 -0700, Edward Kmett <ekm...@gmail.com> wrote:
I hope the above demonstrate that there are at least some fairly reasonable (and, given your request, appropriately category theoretic!) examples where one would want the ability to specify that there is more than one member of a minimal mutual definition. =)
It does, thanks! (And thanks as well to Alexander for the description of proofs). This confirms Ivan's proposal a more general form allowing grouping (&) and exclusion (|) would be needed. The question now is: is that enough and is this a useful approach to the problem that should be moved forward as a more formal suggestion? -- -KQ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
