For those interested, the overall results are in: http://ivanmiljenovic.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/results-of-fgl-naming-survey/
Ivan Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> writes: > Thank you for all the people who have voted; we so far have 42 results > in about 12 hours. > > Some indication of the results so far: > > * 62% prefer inductive-graphs > > * 62% have indicated that they use fgl or do some graph-related stuff > (no correlation, just an interesting coincidence; I have not as yet > done the number crunching to tell what the most popular name is for > people that actually use fgl or other graph stuff). > > * Someone stated that ponies smell sweaty... not sure how that's > relevant, but OK. > > * At least two people prefer the new name as it isn't an acronym (one > because acronyms aren't needed and the term functional is redundant, > the other because the term "graph" isn't directly in the package > name). > > * Martin Erwig himself said that he thinks we should keep using the name > "fgl". > > So, keep the votes coming in (I actually didn't expect this many already)! > > On 14 July 2010 00:24, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Whether or not the new FGL that Thomas Bereknyei and I are working on >> should keep the name was a semi-hot issue when we first mentioned the >> fact that we were working on a new version about a month ago. As such, >> I've created a survey here to try and find out what the Haskell >> community overall thinks we should call it: >> https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dGpzMmFnUWY3Uktodk5wdHlLQk5kT1E6MA >> >> More info can be found on the actual survey page. >> >> -- >> Ivan Lazar Miljenovic >> ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com >> IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com >> -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe