> Only a guess, but I predict that it will work for your purposes, > since you're not concerned about what happens to std_in et al.
I actually am concerned about what happens to std_in. The parent process serializes a bit of state and passes it to the child via the child's std_in. There's probably a better way to do such a thing, but it works for now. >That statement in the documentation is ambiguous, so if it isn't >convenient to just test for this, you need someone to clarify >what "doesn't work" means. I will wait to test this when (and if) I have to put a node on a Windows box. > Sure! At least from a POSIX perspective, and it would be surprising > if a Haskell implementation failed to preserve that. If only I knew for sure that all nodes would remain in the POSIX world. I appreciate the help. --Jonathan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
