On Aug 14, 2:41 am, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH <allb...@ece.cmu.edu> wrote:
> Efficient for what? The most efficient Unicode representation for > Latin-derived strings is UTF-8, but the most efficient for CJK is UTF-16. I think that this kind of programming detail should be handled internally (even if necessary by switching automatically from UTF-8 to UTF-16 depending upon the language). I'm using Haskell so that I can write high level code. In my view I should not have to care if the people using my application write in Farsi, Quechua or Tamil. Kevin _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
