On 09/13/2010 12:45 PM, Gleb Alexeyev wrote:
is, pardon my pun, not ok, because f is let-bound and, therefore, monomorphic
This line doesn't make sense, I was too hasty to hit the 'Send' button, I meant to write 'lambda-bound', of course, apologies for that.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
