David Sankel <cam...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Ertugrul Soeylemez <e...@ertes.de> wrote: > > > Hello Sandra, hello Malcolm, > > > > this sounds like an interesting idea, but unfortunately the site > > won't work without JavaScript. I think, a professional developer > > site should. > > I can understand why it would be slightly better for any website to > not require JavaScript clients since it becomes a bit more > accessible. I'm confused though about why being a "professional > developer" site would make this feature even more important. Care to > expand on that?
Even though I'm being made fun of, Gwern is actually right. When coding I sometimes find it much quicker to use some text browser or in-editor browser to look something up. Developers shouldn't be denied doing that, because development doesn't need fancy eye candy. As said, JavaScript /support/ is fine, but JavaScript /requirement/ isn't. But that's just my humble opinion. Greets, Ertugrul -- nightmare = unsafePerformIO (getWrongWife >>= sex) http://ertes.de/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
