On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Christopher Done <chrisd...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hmm. Maybe we should sort this out. It's incomplete. The Web category > is sporadic: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Category:Web > > Supposing we made a Web/Foo namespace and got some proper hierarchy. > Of interest to most people are: > > * What can I do? > * How can I do it? > * Who has already done it? > * Why did they do it like this? > * What needs doing? > * How up to date is all this information? > > Our discussions here, on IRC and on web-devel should really be > documented. It should be that whenever we create or discover something > substantial for web dev we should document it with examples on the > Wiki. There isn't much centralised comparison of frameworks and > libraries, either. One could make a table of frameworks/libraries and > their features a la Wikipedia does. I don't know many frameworks but > other people can fill the holes in. > > http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Web is a good start, as is > http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Applications_and_libraries/Web_programming > for examples > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Formlets is also a good example of > giving examples of a library. It's nice to link to some blog or > external page but those disappear or lose relevance/compatibility over > time, whereas a Wiki remains, and anyone can update it. For this > reason I think it's a good idea for us to put work into the wiki. > > I'll reformat the entire Web category (immutably! I'll do it in > Web/..) as a proposal, see what you guys think.
+1. I did the rewrite of the /Web wiki page to try to make it more accessible. If you have a better format and want to move some of that content around, feel free to do so. Also, if you need any content or other assistance, please let me know. I think we need to improve our image on the wiki. Michael _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe