On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 18:07, Thomas DuBuisson <thomas.dubuis...@gmail.com> wrote: > If not, perhaps we could make "chunkOverhead = max 16 (2 * > sizeOf (undefined ::Int))" so it will be the same on 64 and 32 > bit systems (a 128 bit boundary, nice and fast for most modern > cipher algorithms, sadly asking for it to match hash block > sizes is a bit much).
I don't have a horse in this race; but I am curious as to why you wouldn't ask for `chunkOverhead = 16' as that seems to be your intent as well as what the expression works out to on any machine in common use. -- Jason Dusek Linux User #510144 | http://counter.li.org/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe