On 10/06/10 13:32, steffen wrote:
A slightly different suggestion from Simon PJ and myself (we agreed on
something syntax-related :-) is the following:
  \case 1 ->  f
        2 ->  g
...
  \case { 1 ->  f; 2 ->  g }
+1

I like this because it has exactly the same properties of Max's
case-of, but is shorter and still reads with sense.
+1
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
+1...million

Cheers,
Greg
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to