On 12 October 2010 14:08, Jacek Generowicz <jacek.generow...@cern.ch> wrote:
> Reading the GHC docs on Data.Dynamic, I infer that Data.Dynamic is > non-standard, but, in principle, portable to other implementations. > > Is that understanding correct? Yes - Data.Dynamic uses some GHC specifics but there are other "lightweight" encodings of dynamic types that I think just use existential types (which John Lato mentioned). _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
