On 29 October 2010 20:19, Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> wrote: > Mental note: must remember to use word "nebulous" more often, I like it.
As do I ;-) > Anyway, integration with existing services would be very good, but I > doubt it will be possible. I don't think there's a way to > automatically create a mailing list, trac project, and so on and so > forth, and I'm not certain it would make sense to make such a feature > possible. I suppose something like this would be a possible goal to > look towards if we ever start working more seriously on single-signon > and the like, but for now, I think we're stuck reinventing the wheel. At the very least, there could be a link to a pre-existing mailing list and trac instance. For those projects/strikeforces/SIGs that don't have existing bug trackers, which would you think of using? Are you suddenly going to write a new one in Haskell? :p > Your SIG idea sounds possible, let's play it out. I'll go with web > development, since I'm personally involved there. I suppose the idea > would be I could create such an interest group, and hopefully > developers on other frameworks (Happstack and Snap for instance) could > join the team. Users may come and start requesting features, and > everyone interested in solving the problem could participate in the > discussion. Seems like it would fit right in with the strike force > proposal, just under a different name. I have no objection to trying > to name this something more generic such as SIG. Yeah, to me "strike force" sounds like a more temporary thing designed to get something done, and then dissolve once that library is written. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe