Daryoush Mehrtash <dmehrt...@gmail.com> wrote in article
<AANLkTim0LTOviud2fyzU7NAsraQMuCKa=qyfroxn8...@mail.gmail.com> in
gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe:
> I see the problem now. But I am confused as to why there are no Bool class
> (like Num, Fractional...) in Haskell. If I had such a class then the
> problem is solved, (by making the "pm a" an instance of it) right? Or are
> there still more issues that I am not seeing?
Sorry, I gave a bad example. Here are two more general symptoms of
direct style: being able to write something like
f (if flip 0.3 then LT else EQ)
where f is an existing function that takes an Ordering argument, and
even being able to write something like
and (map flip [0.3, 0.5])
where and :: [Bool] -> Bool
map :: (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
are existing functions.
--
Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig
1st graffitiist: QUESTION AUTHORITY! 2nd graffitiist: Why?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
