Hi, Am Montag, den 18.04.2011, 07:06 -0300 schrieb Felipe Almeida Lessa: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Joachim Breitner > <m...@joachim-breitner.de> wrote: > > Also, the policies that make life a bit more harder for us are also the > > policies that make Debian a good distribution: E.g. manually creating a > > copyright file describing who all has copyright on the files, and what > > license the files are under – .cabal has fields for that, but > > unfortunately, they very often do not reflect the reality of the .hs > > files. Or the other one, requiring that an upload of a source package is > > accompanied by a manually built and signed binary package ensures that > > the maintainer actually checked that the package builds and hopefully > > has tested it. > > Is it a good solution to have a Debian package containing many Cabal > packages? For example, 'opengl-utils' with all OpenGL-related > packages? Maybe this could be a good compromise.
it’s something that I have in mind to resort to eventually, but our tools currently assume one cabal package per Debian package – but nothing that cannot be fixed. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
