On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 21:29 +0100, Andrew Coppin wrote: > I'm sure this must be a VFAQ, but... There seems to be universal > agreement that Darcs is a nice idea, but is unsuitable for "real" > projects. Even GHC keeps talking about getting rid of Darcs. Can anybody > tell me what the "problems" with Darcs actually are?
I believe the biggest problem was (i.e. when migration started) that there is no big-name-hosting supporting darcs. When code.haskell.org went down people were cut off from code. Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
