On 3 June 2011 20:32, Daniel Schoepe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:19:31 +0300, Guy <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 03/06/2011 12:01, Malcolm Wallace wrote: >> > I believe the motivating example that persuaded the Language Committee to >> > allow these symbols was >> > --> >> > which is not of course used anywhere in the standard libraries, but is an >> > extremely nice symbol to have available in user code. >> >> Seeing as no library actually defines such a symbol, is it worth forcing an >> extra space into comments? [..] > > That's not true, xmonad[0] for example defines a -->-operator; and I > would find making exceptions for --| and --^ very inconsistent and > annoying. > > [0] http://xmonad.org/xmonad-docs/xmonad/XMonad-ManageHook.html#v%3A--%3E
I _knew_ I had seen "-->" somewhere... *glares at Hayoo for not returning said results*. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic [email protected] IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
