> I thought "no type signature" meant no type signature inside b1.
No, it means no type signature for the variable. > Otherwise, you are saying nothing could depend on a binding with a > type signature. By that logic, there can be no mutual dependence, > and so every declaration with a type signature is its own (singleton) > declaration group. A pattern binding can bind more than one variable. If all the variables bound by a binding have type signatures, that binding is indeed a singleton declaration group. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
