-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I recently set out to write a library that required a decent time library. Having only had a flirt with Data.Time previously, I assumed it would be robust like many other haskell libraries. I don't know about consensus, but I have been massively let down. I won't go in to the details, since this is not the point -- I don't wish to complain - -- I wish to get on with it.
So, assuming the consensus is in agreement, is there a reasonable alternative to Data.Time (I looked on hackage and nothing seemed to have come close)? Am I wrong in assuming Data.Time is pretty useless? If I am right, and there is no alternative, I see no option but to take an excursion into writing my own. Ultimately, I am just trying to avoid this. Tips welcome. - -- Tony Morris http://tmorris.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4Ggx4ACgkQmnpgrYe6r61BRQCfbn+1jqNSjR+lxM+4h3gpvAMM VskAoKxqDCETyVAaOdoYDmFJGz1fOGd/ =IC7O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
