On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Olexander Kozlov <ookoz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jason, thank you for your help. The hint for using -s option is very > valuable. > It is good to see people answering questions about Haskell here on > haskell-cafe.
stackoverflow is another good place to ask. > This is really matter. I hope I will be helpfull some day too :) > As for the question I didn't mention in my psot that Fn can be of arbitrary > size. You could extend my solution pretty easily to work for arbitrary size. > Now I have another question which I'm concerned with. I used foldl' (strict) > in my implementation > instead of just foldl (lazy). Does it mean that libraries are to be in two > implementations one strict > and another one lazy? Because there no way to affect strictness/lazyness of > function without modifying > its implementation. I' going to ask this question as a separate thread. It doesn't come up that much. It comes up here with your foldl, with Chans, modifyIORef, modifySTRef, and a few things like that. But most of the time you want a lazy version until you spot a space leak. Most of the time the library creator notices and makes a strict version as needed. One of the nice things about Haskell is that you get a choice between lazy and strict, and lazy by default is nice in many ways. Space leaks like this are not usually show stoppers for experienced Haskell folks. Good luck! Jason _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
