On 13 August 2011 20:57, Joachim Breitner <m...@joachim-breitner.de> wrote: > Maybe it would already help to add a "changelog-file" field to .cabal, > just as with license-file, and reject packages on hackage that do not > have this field and file, and later decide if we need a more > standardized format for changelogs.
I agree, but it would be nice to also have optional readme-file, todo-file and doc-files fields (the latter to let us avoid banging documentation in with "extra-source-files"). As for a standardised format... I'm not sure if we need to enforce a particular format, as long as it's understandable. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
