On 25 October 2011 16:02, Rustom Mody <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic > <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 24 October 2011 13:51, Rustom Mody <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > How does diagrams compare with graphviz? If this is an inappropriate >> > (type-wrong?) question thats ok :-) Its just that when I last looked at >> > graphviz I found the documentation somewhat impenetrable -- like much >> > else >> > in Hackage -- lots of types, no examples. >> >> How is it now, better? If not, what kind of more documentation would you >> like? > > > Without claiming to have looked very hard, I looked up grahhviz in hayoo, > gathered I should be looking at Data.GraphViz and tried clicking everything > that looked reasonable here > but still cant find an example of a graph :-) ie a graphviz graph in > haskell.
Well, there are indeed examples in there, but not in Data.GraphViz: that module is aimed more at "how can I convert my existing data into a Dot representation", not constructing one by hand. As of the latest version (2999.12.*), there are indeed examples for anyone that wants them: * Sample graph in Dot representation used as a base case: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/graphviz/2999.12.0.3/doc/html/Data-GraphViz-Types.html * Using the canonical representation: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/graphviz/2999.12.0.3/doc/html/Data-GraphViz-Types-Canonical.html * Using the graph representation: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/graphviz/2999.12.0.3/doc/html/Data-GraphViz-Types-Generalised.html * Using the Monadic representation (based upon the dotgen package): http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/graphviz/2999.12.0.3/doc/html/Data-GraphViz-Types-Graph.html The Data.GraphViz.Types module also has a short description of how to choose which representation. However, I'll add a note in Data.GraphViz telling people to look in Data.GraphViz.Types if they want to construct a Dot graph by hand. > Is this a complaint against graphviz or against hackage/cabal etc?? Dunno. I'd say it's more a case of: to the maintainer, it's _obvious_ how to do stuff since they're intimately familiar with the details; as such, if something isn't clear let them know that you're confused by something (which at least in my case jogs me to go and add extra clarification on such matters)! -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
