On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
<ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 November 2011 03:19, David Fox <dds...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Ertugrul Soeylemez <e...@ertes.de> wrote:
>>> Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wasn't there talk at one stage of integrating pandoc into haddock?
>>>
>>> I wouldn't mind Haddock depending on Pandoc, at least optionally
>>> (-fmarkdown-comments).  Taking this to its conclusion you could easily
>>> have syntax-highlighted code examples in Haddock documentations and
>>> allow alternative output formats.
>>
>> I'm not sure the pandoc license (GPL) is compatible with the GHC license.
>
> Do you mean because GHC ships with a Haddock binary?
>

Haddock carries the same license as GHC.

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to