On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 November 2011 03:19, David Fox <dds...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Ertugrul Soeylemez <e...@ertes.de> wrote: >>> Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Wasn't there talk at one stage of integrating pandoc into haddock? >>> >>> I wouldn't mind Haddock depending on Pandoc, at least optionally >>> (-fmarkdown-comments). Taking this to its conclusion you could easily >>> have syntax-highlighted code examples in Haddock documentations and >>> allow alternative output formats. >> >> I'm not sure the pandoc license (GPL) is compatible with the GHC license. > > Do you mean because GHC ships with a Haddock binary? >
Haddock carries the same license as GHC. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe