On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Peter Simons <sim...@cryp.to> wrote: > Hi Jose, > > > Peter, would using parsec 3.x be an acceptable solution to you? > > well, we can link xmobar with parsec 3.x on NixOS. The situation > is tricky, though, because the latest version of parsec that we > have, 3.1.2, doesn't compile with GHC 6.10.4 anymore, so we'd > have to use some older version to work around that problem. That > kind of setup somewhat complicated to maintain, which is why I > would prefer to compile xmobar with parsec 2 2 if at all > possible. >
Hi Peter, What errors are you getting compiling with GHC 6.10.4? If its a small thing I certainly don't mind patching things. > Generally speaking, though, GHC 6.10.4 support is not a high > priority. I just thought it might be worth pointing out that > backwards compatibility has been lost in the 0.14 release, > because earlier versions worked just fine. > > Take care, > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
