On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Robert Clausecker <fuz...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Image you would create your own language with a paradigm similar to > Haskell or have to chance to change Haskell without the need to keep any > compatibility. What stuff would you add to your language, what stuff > would you remove and what problems would you solve completely different? > > Thanks in advance for all answers, yours > One thing that concerns me is the use of capital letters to distinguish type and class names and constructors from values. If I was doing it over I would use a typographical distinction like italics for types, bold for classes. That way we could have a constructor named ∅, a function named ∈, a class named ℝ.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
