On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Chris Wong <chrisyco+haskell-c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why not expand it even further? > > class Monoid m where > (•) :: m -> m -> m > (∅) :: m > > (∈) :: (Foldable t, Eq a) => a -> t a -> Bool > > (∘) :: (b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> (a -> c) > > (∧) :: Bool -> Bool -> Bool > > etc. > > We can write a whole Haskell library full of these aliases -- > "syntactic-heroin" perhaps? ;)
Why would you go that far and still not have → ? (: martin _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
