Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote: > I find it funny that conduit is said to be an iteratee library since > it has no iteratees! We've had more than one iteratee library since > at least 1.5 years with the iteratee (Mar 2009) and enumerator (Aug > 2010) packages, and AFAIK now we have four iteratee libraries: those > two, iterIO (May 2011) and pipes (Jan 2012). However, conduit is not > the fifth since it has no iteratees, no enumerators, no enumeratees... > it's a different concept, not a different implementation.
I mostly agree, but I think the real strength of Conduits is that it removes a lot of the complexity of the other Iteratee libraries. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
