On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:05, Arnaud Bailly <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Yves for your advice. And I agree with you that too much laziness may > be mind-blowing for most of the audience, yet this is one of the > characteristics of Haskell, whether or not we like it and whatever troubles > it can induce. > > I really think the knapsack is simple, not too far away from real world and > might be demonstrated with live code in 5 minutes. I will have a look anyway > at more "spectacular" stuff like gloss or yesod but I fear this is out of > scope.
If it suits the medium, you could always throw up a one-liner (e.g. fibonacci from a recursive list) at the end and just leave it there without explanation, for the audience to feel the awesomeness of Haskell ;) /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
