On Mar 3, 2012, at 12:45 , Malcolm Wallace wrote:

> 
> On 3 Mar 2012, at 04:30, Omari Norman wrote:
>> 
>> On the other hand, I notice that attoparsec and polyparse backtrack by 
>> default, and attoparsec claims to be faster than Parsec (I can't remember if 
>> polyparse makes this claim).
> 
> In my benchmarks, polyparse has about the same performance as Parsec, when 
> using the monadic style (possibly a very tiny bit faster).  But polyparse is 
> hugely, asymptotically, faster than Parsec when your parser is written in 
> applicative style, your input text is large, and you consume the parse 
> results lazily.

As is the case for the u-parsinglib ;-}

 Doaiyse


> 
> Regards,
>    Malcolm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to