On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <r...@ro-che.info> wrote: > It's useful to mention the limitations of this package, so that people > know what to expect and don't spend their time testing it to understand > that it doesn't suit their needs.
Good point, I'll put the limitations and TODO stuff into the package description. > For example: > doesn't generate tags for definitions without type signatures That was a conscious decision, though now that I think about it I could assume they're unexported and use vim's static tags for those definitions. I don't know about the most common case, but I almost always have signatures on top level definitions, and I don't really feel like I need tags for where or let-bound definitions. > doesn't understand common extensions, such as type families Oops, that was an oversight. Should be easy enough to fix. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe