On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
<mle...@mega-nerd.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there some sort of a guide for converting existing code Conduit 0.4?
>
> What happened to Control.Monad.Trans.Resource.with?
>
> What happens to stuff that used to to have a type "C.Source m a" which
> now seems to need type "C.Pipe Void a (ResourceT m) a"?
Hmm... I'd be surprised if you really need the Pipe signature that
you're providing. That would mean that you are providing an output
stream of `a`, PLUS a final result of `a`. Most likely, what you want
is:
Pipe Void a (ResourceT m) ()
which would be identical to:
Source (ResourceT m) a
The recommended approach though would be more like:
MonadResource m => Source m a
Since that gives more flexibility about where in your monad stack you
place the ResourceT.
Michael
>
> Cheers,
> Erik
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Erik de Castro Lopo
> http://www.mega-nerd.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
