On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Harendra Kumar <harendra.ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about cabal-install using the YAML format as hpack has proven that it > works very well for expressing the existing .cabal files? YAML is simple, > flexible and open, used across many tools so the knowledge of format is > more widely sharable which has its advantages. Are there reasons to keep > using the cabal format other than the legacy reasons and the pain of asking > everyone to move to another format? Could you explain what aspect of a format for which all code and documentation is open source defines it as "closed" to you? -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Haskell-community mailing list Haskell-community@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
