On 16 September 2016 at 12:35, Imants Cekusins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why not adopt (a subset of) .hs AST file format to structure both project > and package files? > Aha, that's my preferred choice. If there is a way to restrict features and we can allow just a subset we can have a nice configuration language which is a real language. In fact, I have been toying around this. If we have to express not just a package specification but a sophisticated build configuration, we need a real language. Expressing conditionals, reuse etc becomes a compromise in a purely declarative language. For example make has so many built-in functions in it that it has become a full fledged language by itself. The google bazel build uses python as the build config language. Haskell will make a much better choice for such use cases. Pure declarative is a pain for such use cases. -harendra
_______________________________________________ Haskell-community mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
