I think I've set this up to point to the google group, but I'm not
allowed to post to the group myself to test this :-)

I got this message from Google:

"We're writing to let you know that the group you tried to contact
(haskell-core-libraries) may not exist, or you may not have permission
to post messages to the group. A few more details on why you weren't
able to post:

 * You might have spelled or formatted the group name incorrectly.
 * The owner of the group may have removed this group.
 * You may need to join the group before receiving permission to post.
 * This group may not be open to posting.
"

On 14/06/2013 19:08, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> I think that makes sense - the alternative would be a private mailman
> list on the haskell.org infrastructure.
> 
> [email protected] probably ought to have something like that too.
> 
> On 14/06/2013 19:03, Edward Kmett wrote:
>> That would explain why I wasn't sure where it was or how it worked! =)
>>
>> Lets try it this way:
>>
>> When it didn't look like this was going to happen any time soon I took
>> the liberty of creating a private google group:
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>> Why don't we just configure the alias to point to that. That way we get
>> archival, and easier subscription management than doing so directly in
>> /etc/aliases and the alias ties it back to haskell.org <http://haskell.org>.
>>
>> -Edward
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Does the haskell.org <http://haskell.org> committee list have
>>     mailman archival? I remember I
>>     set up a one-off archive of the previous year's correspondence at the
>>     first committee changeover, but I'm not aware of anything ongoing.
>>
>>     On 14/06/2013 18:47, Edward Kmett wrote:
>>     > Thanks, Ganesh.
>>     >
>>     > The recipients for [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> should be:
>>     >
>>     > * Edward Kmett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > * Mark Lentczner <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > * Dan Doel <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > * Brent Yorgey <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > * Joachim Breitner <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > * Doug Beardsley <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > * Michael Snoyman <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > * Ian Lynagh <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > * Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >
>>     > The last two aren't technically on the committee, but need to be
>>     in the loop.
>>     >
>>     > It would be great if we could get the same kind of mailman
>>     archival we currently get on the haskell.org <http://haskell.org>
>>     <http://haskell.org> committee mailing list, but I know very little
>>     about how that is configured.
>>     >
>>     > Once the alias is configured we can send out a broader
>>     announcement about the creation and composition of the committee.
>>     >
>>     > Thanks again!
>>     >
>>     > -Edward
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Ganesh Sittampalam
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >     On 02/06/2013 18:38, Edward Kmett wrote:
>>     >     > We've just formed the core libraries committee and will be
>>     >     announcing it
>>     >     > shortly, but in the meantime we'd like to set up a closed
>>     mailing
>>     >     list,
>>     >     > like the one we have for [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     >     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>,
>>     >     probably under
>>     >     > [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     >     > <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>     >     >
>>     >     > What do we need to do to configure this and maintain membership?
>>     >
>>     >     We'll need to sort out the ongoing maintenance question more
>>     generally,
>>     >     but for now mail me the list of addresses to go on and I'll setup
>>     >     the alias.
>>     >
>>     >     Ganesh
>>     >
>>     >     _______________________________________________
>>     >     haskell-infrastructure mailing list
>>     >     [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     >    
>>     http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> haskell-infrastructure mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure
> 

_______________________________________________
haskell-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure

Reply via email to