Cc committee at haskell.org

My sense, speaking as an individual member of the committee, is that
I'm perfectly happy to leave the ownership and control of the domain
in the hands of yale and galois respectively for the time being, and
just repoint the nameserver records. Transferring proper control of
the domain is probably the correct thing in the long term. The way it
seems best to do that would be via the spi, which as I read here
(http://www.spi-inc.org/projects/services/) does offer to act to hold
"intangible assets" such as domain names.

They do note that once transferred to the SPI, such holdings can only
be in the future transferred to another 501(c)3 nonprofit. At the
moment I don't see the obstruction there, but such a decision could
have unforseen long-term consequences, so this is something I think we
would want to really discuss carefully.

Anyway, in the short term, option b) is the most we'll want to do
anytime soon, but option c) is something that we should at least
continue to remember exists, and which we may wish to revisit.

Cheers,
Gershom


On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Paul Heinlein <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Austin Seipp wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Who's currently in control of the DNS nameserver entries for Haskell.org?
>
>
> Legally, John Peterson is, but I have control of his account at Network
> Solutions.
>
> I'd be happy to
>
> a) leave things as they are,
> b) adjust the nameserver records for the domain,
> c) work with the haskell.org committe to transfer control
>    of the domain.
>
> Just let me know.
>
> --
> Paul Heinlein                 Galois, Inc.
> Systems Administrator         421 SW Sixth Avenue, Suite 300
> [email protected]           Portland, Oregon 97204
> +1 503 626-6616 x140          http://galois.com/
_______________________________________________
haskell-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure

Reply via email to