> Also don’t forget that many www.haskell.org subdirectories continue to 
> correspond to plain old websites and not wiki pages.
> 
> /ghc
> /platform
> /hoogle
> /cabal
> /haddock

From my perspective, at least haddock we can convert to GitHub pages
(CCing Mateusz Kowalczyk).

Cheers.

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:25:44AM -0400, Gershom B wrote:
> This sounds like a great plan, except a word of caution on what we need to do 
> for a few “other things”. We can of course move first and do some of those 
> other things later too. So to be more concrete:
> 
> Migrate hackage, www, and lambda, yes!
> 
> Migrate community — well yes, but… migrate all the logins too? If not, 
> there’s really no point. On the plus side, all the software community needs 
> is really user and project directories, and git and darcs, really.
> 
> Kill trac.h.o — absolutely! However, we really do need to take that last poll 
> and give warning if anyone actually still is using it.
> 
> Kill rt.h.o in favor of phab — absolutely! But it still is used as part of 
> the community.haskell.org process, and tickets are still created on it to 
> manage those accounts. So we can always redirect [email protected] 
> emails to create phab tickets, etc, but we must make sure that we set all the 
> bits up to do so.
> 
> www -> new-www. Yep, we still need more hands on deck to finish the site and 
> polish it. I put out a call at the HIW for help with this, but in general it 
> will take some collective effort to get it the “second 90%” there.
> 
> Also, don’t forget:
> 
> planet.haskell.org — served off community using Venus I believe.
> 
> Also don’t forget that many www.haskell.org subdirectories continue to 
> correspond to plain old websites and not wiki pages.
> 
> /ghc
> /platform
> /hoogle
> /cabal
> /haddock
> 
> for example.
> 
> Cheers,
> Gershom
> 
> On September 8, 2014 at 1:43:29 AM, Austin Seipp ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Hi *,
> >  
> > As I'm sure some of you are aware, Haskell.org recently had
> > reliability problems with its virtualization host, an EX40 machine
> > located on Hetzner.
> >  
> > We dealt with it (for the most part), but a part of this was actually
> > migrating servers to a new provider to alleviate I/O load on the host
> > system.
> >  
> > As I mentioned last year, we've gotten support from Rackspace for
> > Haskell.org. In particular, this weekend we moved ghc.haskell.org to
> > Rackspace. This comes with nice amounts of dedicated bandwith and more
> > resources that should last a long time.
> >  
> > I plan on migrating Hackage to a new dedicated server this week. Me
> > and John hope to migrate www to Rackspace by the end of this week,
> > hopefully. These are the 3 servers located on the EX40 server, Rock.
> >  
> > Furthermore, we have an older server, the one running
> > lambda.haskell.org and community.haskell.org, running with Hetzner
> > too. I think we can migrate these quickly as well.
> >  
> > This means that Rock, the EX40 server, will now be effectively unused.
> > And we will move the old servers too. So both of these can be shut
> > down, and we don't have to pay for them! That's a lot of money saved!
> >  
> > We'll also be doing some other things:
> >  
> > - We'll be splitting the mailing system to a separate server, 
> > mail.haskell.org
> >  
> > - We'll be moving the DNS nameservers, as I said in my last email.
> > - I'll probably clean up the DNS entries, and we'll be able to add
> > AAAA records for all the servers now.
> >  
> > - We'll be shutting down several services, like
> > - trac.haskell.org (unmaintained, spammed, mostly unused). See the
> > discussion last month about this.
> > - rt.haskell.org (we're using and suggest
> > https://phabricator.haskell.org for new issues)
> >  
> > - The wiki will move to a new server, wiki.haskell.org, and will
> > still serve as the homepage for a little bit.
> >  
> > - Then we'll deploy http://new-www.haskell.org as www.haskell.org,
> > and redirect things to wiki.haskell.org where necessary.
> >  
> > - We'll move the downloads for the Haskell Platform to a new server
> > so Mark can upload them there.
> >  
> > So, what does everyone think about this? Is there anything I'm
> > forgetting? We can hopefully get this done in the next few weeks if
> > the admin team just pitches in a few hours here and there.
> >  
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Austin - PGP: 4096R/0x91384671
> >  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> haskell-infrastructure mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
haskell-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
http://community.galois.com/mailman/listinfo/haskell-infrastructure

Reply via email to